This is not a scientific paper, so I will not get into the finer points of collecting carbon in sinks (in this case in trees). But, yes, you can get paid to grow blocks of trees that are left in their natural state and allowed to grow undisturbed and store carbon from the air. It does seem simple but many conditions must be met. The companies who are buying carbon credits are usually large companies that burn lots of fossil fuels, an example is airlines and transportation companies. You must be committed to giving up the use of acreage that you cannot disturb for farming or timber harvesting. Yes, you can still use the forest for food gathering (an example is mushrooms, grubs, fruit, and nuts) and leave it as natural forests attract tourism. It is the owner’s responsibility to prevent forest fires, disease, and theft. A qualified Forester will need to determine a baseline at commencement and measure the growth of the carbon sink. His time for data collection is at a premium and then the carbon (which is measured by the ton must be sold). There are many companies that do this on a commission basis. So, is it worth it? Yes! I am hoping landowners who are registered with the Sustainable Fuelwood Initiative can set aside parcels of land inside their family holdings, investment land, and farms. The Chiefdoms we work with are getting the same advice. The loss of these lands for fuelwood production can be offset by plantations of fast-growing trees for fuelwood production. Remember that trees do not need prime agricultural land to grow successfully. Other benefits of creating these carbon sinks are many, but the most needed is the management of rainwater and erosion.